Showing posts with label What's New. Show all posts
Showing posts with label What's New. Show all posts

Wednesday, 4 September 2013

Free Lookup Tool for ICD-10 on www.MedicalBillingandCodingOnline.com

MedicalBillingandCodingOnline.com is committed to providing comprehensive, up-to-date resources on the medical coding industry. As the health care grows and processes evolve, the demand for medical billers and coders will remain strong. We’ve developed these free online courses that cover every aspect of medical coding and billing to help students keep up and remain competitive in the workforce.

It has a compilation of resources including articles that will let students learn everything they need to know about this specialized field. This includes learning about billing and coding, discovering their scholarship options, and knowing what they need to become a certified medical coder or biller.

The directory lets them discover medical billing and coding programs in different schools in each state. This will help them filter the best program/s that will meet their educational and career goals.

One of the most useful tools we have in our resource is http://www.MedicalBillingAndCodingonline.com/ICD-10/ that provides prospective and current students with information on the (International Classification of Diseases) ICD-10. We have created a unique lookup tool which you can use on the site or embed it on yours to share with others that are interested. Included is a comprehensive ICD-10 guide which will help you understand the changes that will take place and the issues that are commonly asked about once it is implemented on October 2014.

Using the ICD-10 Lookup Tool, you can explore the depths of the ICD-10 system in just a few clicks! With our tool, you can quickly browse and find the right code for any ICD-10 listed disease. It allows you to browse through more than 16,000 codes and find valuable data including mortality data broken down by disease, age group, and sex.

By Camila Martinez

(Invited Post)

Sunday, 10 June 2012

What’s new in NABH 3rd Edition for Hospitals? [Chapter 2: Care of Patients] – Part 2


COP-8 in the revised edition is the corresponding COP-6 in 2nd edition. Nothing much changes in this standard, except that a new objective element has been added. COP-8a reads as “Documented policies and procedures are used to guide the care of patients in the intensive care and high dependency units” which basically deals with issues which were left out in the previous edition. The element recommends that the documentation should include information on how care is organized, what is the procedure of monitoring the patients and what would be the nurse-patient ratio.

The standard COP-8 in the 2nd edition only covered care of high-risk obstetrics patients. The corresponding standard COP-10 in the 3rd edition expands the scope of this stand by covering obstetric care. The revised standard statement (COP-10) states that “Documented policies and procedures guide obstetric care.” The standard opens with a new objective element COP-10a stating “There is a documented policy and procedure for obstetric services.” The standard also incorporates a new objective element COP-10d which states that “Documented procedures guide provision for ante-natal services.” This is followed up by another new objective element COP-10f which states that “Appropriate pre-natal, peri-natal and post-natal monitoring is performed and documented.” These are welcome changes in this standard as NABH views the obstetric care in totality. From the experience of changes in some standards in AAC, we can expect that future revisions will come out with further guidelines on ante-natal services and pre-natal, peri-natal and post-natal monitoring. Overall, three new objective elements have been added to this revised standard.

In the standard COP-11, which corresponds to COP-9 of 2nd edition, there are not many changes in the existing objective elements. Only a new objective element has been added COP-11a which states that “There is a documented policy and procedure for paediatric services.

COP-12 in the 3rd edition deals with care of patients undergoing moderate sedation, which corresponds to standard COP-10 in 2nd edition. Two new objective elements have been introduced in this revised standard. COP-12a states that “Documented procedures guide the administration of moderate sedation” and COP-12b states that “Informed consent for administration of moderate sedation is obtained”. These two objective elements fill the gap that existed between the standard’s definition and the objective elements elaborating the standard itself.

COP-13 (in 3rd edition) has tried to removed confusion arising out of various interpretations of the terms ‘anesthetist’ and ‘qualified individual’ used in the earlier standard COP-11 in 2nd edition. COP-13 replaces each of these terms with an ‘anesthesiologist’ thereby clarifying that the physician qualified for this job has to do it. COP-13 deals with the administration of anesthesia. There are two new objective elements added to this standard – COP-13i and COP-13j. COP-13i states that “The type of anaesthesia and anaesthetic medications used is documented in the patient record” while COP-13j reads as “Procedures shall comply with infection control guidelines to prevent cross-infection between patients.

Two new objective elements have been added to COP-14 (COP-12 in 2nd edition) covering surgical procedures. “Patient, personnel and material flow conforms to infection control practices” and “Appropriate facilities and equipment/appliances/instrumentation are available in the operating theatre” have been added as COP-14h and COP-14i respectively. But the objective element on monitoring of surgical site infection rate (COP-12j in 2nd edition) has been removed from this standard and will be addressed in HIC-4.

In the 2nd edition, COP-14 addressed pain management issues and COP-16 is the standard that deals with the topic in 3rd edition. So while the earlier standard required the hospital to support assessment and management of pain for all patients, the new definition makes it mandatory for all patients to undergo screening for pain. The revised standard provides provision for the same through two new objective elements. COP-16b requires that “All patients are screened for pain” and COP-16c recommends that “Patients with pain undergo detailed assessment and periodic re-assessment”.

Standard COP-17 in 3rd edition (corresponding to COP-15 in 2nd edition) provides additional requirements on rehabilitative services through three new objective elements in addition to the existing requirements. COP-17c states that “Care is guided by functional assessment and periodic re-assessment which is done and documented by qualified individual(s)”, COP-17d requires “Care is provided adhering to infection control and safe practices” and COP-17f mandates that “There is adequate space and equipment to perform these activities.

The last standard in the chapter, COP-20, deals with end of life care (corresponding to COP-18 in 2nd edition). The revised standard has done away with the objective element on autopsy and organ donation (COP-18d of 2nd edition) and has introduced a new objective element, COP-20d which requires that “Symptomatic treatment is provided and where appropriate measures are taken for alleviation of pain”.

In conclusion, in the chapter COP in the revised edition of NABH (3rd edition), there was an addition of 37 new objective elements and 2 new standards (which contributed 14 of the 37 new objective elements). 4 objective elements of COP in 2nd edition were also removed. Therefore, chapter COP in 3rd edition has 20 standards and 136 objective elements.

What’s new in NABH 3rd Edition for Hospitals? [Chapter 2: Care of Patients] – Part 1

Continuing with our discussion on what’s new in NABH third edition compared to the previous edition, in this post we cover the chapter on Care of Patients (COP).

Like mentioned in the changes in chapter AAC, objective elements in COP also have become more specific. COP-1a begins with uniformity in care delivery in different settings in the hospital. In 3rd edition, COP-1a also requires care to be uniform for a given health problem. COP-1c and COP-1d in the 2nd edition required the primary consultant of the patient to sign and provide his name on the treatment orders along with date and time and the care plan be counter-signed by clinician in-charge of the patient. These 2 requirements have been removed from this standard COP-1. These conditions are now addressed in AAC-4 in the revised standards (check here).

In COP-2 in 3rd edition, a few changes have been made to sentences in the objective elements to bring in specificity. A new objective element COP-2g has also been added – “In case of discharge to home or transfer to another organization a discharge note shall be given to patient”. However, I feel this aspect was adequately addressed in AAC-13d (“A discharge summary is given to all the patients leaving the organization” in revised edition) because this objective element covers all and every kind of discharges happening from the hospital and the remarks in the new objective element also advise the readers to refer to AAC 13 and 14. If being specific was the objective, this could have been dealt with by providing some more explanation in AAC 13 and 14 itself for the emergency patients like they have done for LAMA patients.

COP-3 in 2nd edition required equipment and emergency medications to be checked on a daily basis (COP-3e and COP-3f) and COP-3d required a checklist of both of these to be maintained. In the 3rd edition, the checklist part has been added to the existing objective elements of COP-3e and COP-3f and so the particular element COP-3d became redundant. These requirements are now covered under COP-3f and COP-3g as “Equipment are checked on a daily basis using a checklist” and “Emergency medications are checked daily and prior to dispatch using a checklist” respectively. There are also 2 new objective elements introduced in this standard. COP-3b states that “The ambulance adheres to statutory requirements” and COP-3e states that “Ambulance(s) is checked on a daily basis.” Therefore there is a new addition of one objective element in this standard.

In COP-4, the only visible change is in COP-4d. While this element under 2nd edition required that all cardiac arrests be analyzed, in the 3rd edition this requirement has been modified and the revised objective element requires all cardio-pulmonary resuscitations to be analyzed.

There are two new standards introduced in COP as “Documented policies and procedures guide nursing care” and “Documented procedures guide the performance of various procedures” finds their place as COP-5 and COP-6 respectively.

The new COP-5 has seven objective elements. These are:
  1. There are documented policies and procedures for all activities of the nursing services.” (COP-5a)
  2. These reflect current standards of nursing services and practice, relevant regulations and purposes of the services.” (COP-5b)
  3. Assignment of patient care is done as per current good practice guidelines.” (COP-5c)
  4. Nursing care is aligned and integrated with overall patient care.” (COP-5d)
  5. Care provided by nurses is documented in the patient record.” (COP-5e)
  6. Nurses are provided with adequate equipment for providing safe and efficient nursing services.” (COP-5f)
  7. Nurses are empowered to take nursing-related decisions to ensure timely care of patients.” (COP-5g)

The new COP-6 also has seven objective elements, as given below:
  1. Documented procedures are used to guide the performance of various clinical procedures.” (COP-6a)
  2. Only qualified personnel order, plan, perform and assist in performing procedures.” (COP-6b)
  3. Documented procedures exist to prevent adverse events like wrong site, wrong patient and wrong procedure.” (COP-6c)
  4. Informed consent is taken by the personnel performing the procedure, where applicable.” (COP-6d)
  5. Adherence to standard precautions and asepsis is adhered to during the conduct of the procedure.” (COP-6e)
  6. Patients are appropriately monitored during and after the procedure.” (COP-6f)
  7. Procedures are documented accurately in the patient record.” (COP-6g)

Because of these two additions in the list, the standard COP-5 in 2nd edition has now been shifted 2 steps lower in the list and now becomes COP-7 in the revised edition.

COP-7 in the revised edition deals with the standard on rational use of blood and blood products. Compared to the corresponding standard COP-5 in the previous edition, 2 new objective elements have been introduced in this standard. COP-7b states that “Documented procedures guide transfusion of blood and blood products”, so there is specific focus on the activity of transfusion and NABH recommends that its reference guide on ‘NABH standards for blood banks’ be used for preparing the procedures.

The new element COP-7f states that “The organization defines the process for availability and transfusion of blood/blood components for use in emergency”. Hospitals should see this element in context of COP-2 which deals with emergency services.

What's new in NABH Third Edition: Chapter 2 - Care of Patients (Part 2)

Friday, 1 June 2012

Clinical and Managerial Quality Indicators become sharper in NABH Third Edition

NABH deserves our appreciation for proving a lot more clear guidelines and better framed objective elements to remove discretion on the part of different HCOs as part of the released third edition. The standards that benefitted most seem to be (purely on quantifiable terms) those of clinical and managerial quality indicators.

The new edition takes all pains to explain in detail each of the mandatory indicators mentioned in CQI chapter. At the back of the new book, you can find several pages (37 to be precise) detailing each of the quality indicators (QI) mentioned in CQI-3 and CQI-4. The section defines the QI, provides the formula to calculate the QI, also suggests a sample size for proper measurement and gives remarks wherever necessary. In case anyone missed this, NABH also demands each indicator to be captured on a monthly basis and that month’s data only to be referred to for calculating the QI using the newly-provided formulae.

Sometime back I heard from an NABH Principal Assessor that NABH is planning to have a system across its accreditated hospitals using which one could compare these hospitals. Such a comparative system would enable ranking of the accreditated hospitals based on their performance on these measurable QIs. Is the third edition first step in that direction?

The impetus on statutory compliances in NABH accreditation

NABH standard ROM-1 (Responsibilities of Management) in the 2nd edition touched on the requirement for compliances to applicable laws and regulations as part of the objective element ROM-1h. The latest edition of NABH has gone one step ahead, with the formulation of a completely separate standard on this requirement. So now ROM-2 reads as “The organization complies with the laid-down and applicable legislations and regulations”. Indeed this is a welcome step as it leaves little scope for hospitals to non-comply as the new standard deals with management’s knowledge about the laws and regulations, implementation of the same with a proper mechanism to update the licenses, registrations and certifications from time to time.

For organizations planning to put the house in order and start the journey towards NABH accreditation, you can systematically check your compliance to this new standard. From our research, we have observed that most of the statutory and regulatory requirements can be categorized into following categories:
  • Air & Water
  • Bio-medical waste
  • Blood Bank
  • Electrical
  • Fire safety related
  • HR-related
  • Pharmacy
  • PNDT & MTP
  • Radiology equipment
  • Software licenses
  • Various State and Central Govt. Taxes
Depending on the size of your organization and the scope of your services, each of these categories may have various requirements under them. For example, if you have X-Ray and CT in your hospital, AERB approvals for your equipment and layout become a mandatory requirement. You also should be keeping a track of safety and maintenance related activities for these radiology equipments.

Wednesday, 30 May 2012

What’s new in NABH 3rd Edition for Hospitals? [Chapter 1: Access, Assessment and Continuity of Care]

The 3rd edition is an attempt to bring specificity to certain aspects of patient care covered in various chapters. There is also a bit more clarity introduced in certain standards. So let’s look at what’s new in the first chapter, i.e. Access, Assessment and Continuity of Care.

Many of the objective elements of AAC in 2nd edition began with the phrases “The policies and procedures guide….” or “Policies  guide….” and in the 3rd edition, the word ‘Documented’ has been added in the beginning of these sentences. So AAC-2a would read as “Documented policies and procedures are used for registering and admitting patients.” or AAC-3d now reads as “The documented procedures identify staff responsible during transfer/referral.” Clearly NABH wants HCOs to document their process, policies and procedures very clearly and not to leave things to the imagination of the employees. Even unwritten policies followed consistently in the organization should now get documented so that there is a visible evidence to establish compliance.

AAC-2 has a new objective element added to the list – “A unique identification number is generated at the end of registration.” In relation to this, the standard on discharge summary (previously AAC-15, now AAC-14) also has a new objective element – “Discharge summary contains the patient's name, unique identification number, date of admission and date of discharge.” This new addition hints towards NABH’s advice to hospitals to go for computerization, i.e. implement a hospital information system (HIS) or hospital management system (HMS).

In 2nd edition, AAC-3 began with the following objective element – “Policies guide the transfer of unstable patients to another facility in an appropriate manner.” AAC-3 missed out on covering patients who would get transferred into a hospital. So a new objective element AAC-3a – “Documented policies and procedures guide the transfer-in of patients to the organization” tries to address this issue. AAC-3b becomes more specific with the text – “Documented policies and procedures guide the transfer-out/referral of unstable patients to another facility in an appropriate manner.”

Standard AAC-4 from 2nd edition (During admission the patient and/ or family members are educated to make informed decision) has been scrapped because the chapter on Patient Rights and Education (PRE) deals with this issue adequately.

The standard on ‘initial assessment’ deals about content of assessment, person responsible for this activity, time frame of this activity and other contents of the initial assessment. In edition 3, standard AAC-4 (earlier AAC-5) comes up with 3 new objective elements: “Initial assessment of in-patients includes nursing assessment which is done at the time of admission and documented”, “The plan of care is countersigned by the clinician in-charge of the patient within 24 hours” and “The plan of care includes goals or desired results of the treatment, care or service” to include the roles of nurses and clinicians in initial assessment.

The standard “Patients cared for by the organization undergo a regular reassessment” (AAC-6 in 2nd edition) was silent about whether it covered OP patients, IP patients or both. Standard AAC-5 in 3rd edition takes care of this confusion with the inclusion of two new objective elements – “Out-patients are informed of their next follow-up, where appropriate” and “For in-patients during reassessment the plan of care is monitored and modified, where found necessary”.

The standards dealing with laboratory and imaging services (AAC-7 and AAC-10 in edition 2) defined scope of their services in terms of “requirements of the patients”. Of course this was very ambiguous. So the edition 3 has aligned these to the documented scope of services of the hospital. The new standards AAC-6 and AAC-9 read as “Laboratory services are provided as per the scope of services of the organization” and “Imaging services are provided as per the scope of services of the organization” respectively. In each of these standards, 2 new objective elements have also been introduced. “The infrastructure (physical and manpower) is adequate to provide for its defined scope of services” and “Results are reported in a standardized manner” expand the scope of these standards.

Since the chapter Facility Management and Safety (FMS) contains standards on safety, edition 3 has done away with the objective element “Policies and procedures guide the safe use of radioactive isotopes for imaging services” (AAC-12h in 2nd edition).

AAC-12 of 2nd edition also defined objective element AAC-12c as “Written policies and procedures guide the handling and disposal of radio-active and hazardous materials”, so there was some scope left for HCOs to follow their own policies which may be in conflict with or non-compliance of statutory guidelines. The new standard AAC-11c removes this conflict by stating the element as “Handling, usage and disposal of radio-active and hazardous materials are as per statutory requirements.”

A new aspect was added to the standard “Patient care is continuous and multidisciplinary in nature” with the inclusion of the objective element “Transfers between departments/units are done in a safe manner” (AAC-12e in 3rd edition).

In all, compared to 2nd edition, 3rd edition has scrapped 5 objective elements and 1 standard (which had 4 of the 5 scrapped objective elements). The new edition has also introduced 13 new objective elements. Therefore chapter AAC in 3rd edition has 14 standards and 90 objective elements.