During a recent discussion with a
friend, a question came up – Which city/state/regions in India are doing well
in terms of NABH accreditation? No one had a number at hand, except that 137 hospitals
hold the accreditation and 2 of them having their status as “Accreditation kept
in Abeyance” as we speak.
I got a chance to do what I love
the most – Data analysis! Here’s the summary of data I found from NABH’s
website, with the reference link: http://www.nabh.co/main/hospitals/accredited.asp
(last accessed on July 20th, 2012).
Here’s an alphabetical listing of
city-wise number of accredited hospitals as of date:
City/State
|
No. of Accredited Hospitals
|
Ahmedabad
|
3
|
Amritsar
|
1
|
Bangalore
|
14
|
Bhavnagar
|
1
|
Calicut
|
2
|
Chennai
|
6
|
Cochin
|
1
|
Coimbatore
|
5
|
Ernakulum
|
1
|
Faridabad
|
4
|
Gandhinagar
|
2
|
Ghaziabad
|
3
|
Gurgaon
|
5
|
Hyderabad
|
10
|
Jaipur
|
4
|
Kalyan
|
1
|
Kerala
|
1
|
Kochi
|
1
|
Kolkata
|
3
|
Lucknow
|
1
|
Madurai
|
1
|
Manipal
|
1
|
Meerut
|
1
|
Mohali
|
2
|
Mumbai
|
7
|
Mysore
|
1
|
Nagpur
|
2
|
Namakkal
|
1
|
Nashik
|
1
|
New
Delhi
|
29
|
Noida
|
4
|
Pune
|
2
|
Rajkot
|
1
|
Secunderabad
|
4
|
Sholingur
|
1
|
Surat
|
1
|
Thane
|
1
|
Thiruvananthapuram
|
1
|
Trichur
|
1
|
Udaipur
|
1
|
Vadodara
|
4
|
Visakhapatnam
|
1
|
Total
|
137
|
If we do a region-wise
segmentation, the numbers would look like this:
Region
|
No. of Accredited Hospitals
|
East
|
3
|
North
|
50
|
South
|
53
|
West
|
31
|
Total
|
137
|
Clearly, NABH had the major impact
closer to its base as Delhi has the maximum number of accredited hospitals, followed
by my home-sweet-home Bangalore and Hyderabad finishes third.
Among themselves, the four metro
cities of Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata and Chennai account for 45 accredited
hospitals, which is one-third the total number of accredited hospitals. Of
course, Kolkata only contributes 3 hospitals to this sum, so I would say just 3
cities contribute 30% of the total accredited hospitals. Shouldn’t it be a
cause of concern?
Region-wise, I got a shocker,
with Eastern India only having 3 accredited hospitals, which is a paltry 2% of
the total. I guess either NABH has not promoted itself well in the east of the
country, or there aren’t good standard hospitals in that region. I hope the
former is true. North and South share among themselves more than 100 accredited
hospitals. But in the Northern region, except for Delhi, other states haven’t
done as well as they should have done. Clearly, there is need to create
awareness about NABH in those states and I would be happy if we could help.
In the South, there is a
relatively even spread of accredited hospitals in various states, but Karnataka
seems to have the edge. One possible reason could be the fact that Bangalore is
the hub of a lot of activities that NABH conducts in the southern region (as per my observation).
No comments:
Post a Comment